Add-ons
graciliano
About me
| Name | graciliano |
|---|---|
| User since | March 5, 2007 |
| Number of add-ons developed | 1 theme |
| Average rating of developer's add-ons | Rated 4 out of 5 stars |
Add-ons I've created
Phoenity ThunderbirdMy Reviews
Deadpool Emblem
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
The general dark background is nice on its own. The logo adds a nice touch that makes it entertaining, yet it is not distracting.
Unshamed Orange
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
This light theme has an intricate pattern that could make elements, such as text, to recognize. However the image is keeps its colors within a small range of dark tones and hue. This makes a beautiful complex design that is not distracting.
Black Shine
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
It fits beautifully in my toolbox and causes no distraction. I combined this light theme my own complete theme and it looks terrific! It could not have a more appropriate name because that is what it added to my setting.
Stylish - Custom themes for any website
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
Keeping up with the changes in Firefox is a challenge to developers and maintaining compatibility with Nightly can easily become an issue. It can take some time to adjust to changes in Nightly. But a solution to the latest incompatibility with Nightly is already in the project area so a release with it should arrive soon.
This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.0.4). This user has a previous review of this add-on.Stylish - Custom themes for any website
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
As described, it provides tools for customizing not only web pages, but the browser (Firefox) itself. The site userstyles.org has many styles already made that can make the way you experience Firefox to the way you like. For instance, I found a great style to change the default homepage to have a custom background and show no logo (my background is the picture of a beautiful Fox). I also customized my new tab page to show the page tiles with a 16x9 aspect instead of 4x3. I found styles that will hide ads on some of my frequently visited web pages and make them more tidy. I also made one of my own for such purpose.
I disagree criley's argument for stating the Firefox version is inferior to the Chrome version. A single style document (css) can have many sections to affect different URLs in different ways. In the Chrome version the sections for different URLs are separated into different sub-documents. Indeed, if you write a style with the Chrome version, you will need to convert the style into the Firefox single document format before publishing it. That other implementation ads a level of abstraction, but little is gained from it. Yet there is one point were the Chrome implementation is better: Error checking in the Chrome version is better. But that version lacks the automatic word completion you get in the Firefox version. I think the best version is whichever matches the browser you like, and Firefox definitively renders my web pages more beautiful than the alternatives.
To create your own collections, you must have a Mozilla Add-ons account.
