Puntuado con 3 de 5 estrellas

por Willi Also el Jul. 23, 2013 ·

I don't understand the sense of this add-on. Since netscape.security.PrivilegeManager is disabled, the access by uri file://...xul does not give any advantage for developers anymore. Potentially I missed something.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (1.2.1-signed).  Este usuario tiene una valoración anterior de este complemento.

de Jorge Villalobos (desarrollador) el Jul. 23, 2013 ·

This add-on is mostly there to support legacy applications that should be migrated to other technologies. Some use file://, while other still host their XUL applications on web servers. Some of those applications take advantage of XUL widgets and some of its features, without using the PrivilegeManager.