Добро пожаловать в дополнения SeaMonkey.
Добавляйте дополнительные функции и стили, чтобы настроить SeaMonkey по своему вкусу.
ЗакрытьОтзыв на Provider for Google Calendar от Cianoz
Рейтинг 3 из 5 звёзд
OK, since any answer comes from the dev I give my contribution for this question.
I've made extensive tests using both native remote calendar subscription and this extension.
The main difference (but not the only) I found, and it's fundamental, is that native subscription access the Google Calendar in read only mode, while the extension gives full write access.
It seems to works quite well
---------
As in title. Why would we have to prefer this addon instead of subscribing natively remote calendar with Lightning?
I think a clarification would be welcome
Для создания своих подборок вам необходимо иметь учётную запись на сайте дополнений Mozilla.