5점중 5점 받음

작성: alex, 날짜: 1월 21, 2018 ·

очень клевое дополнение. пользовался несколько лет пока мозилла не обновилась примерно год назад, может меньше. теперь на крайнюю версию не ставится на 7-64. тут я разочарован. надеюсь совместимость восстановят. про дополнение узнал случайно. снимаю шляпу перед автором программы и идеи, огромное спасибо.
из изменений не понравилось : что убрали управление в кнопку меню из контекстного меню. стало очень неудобно. хотя может идея была не доделана.

5점중 1점 받음

작성: QSuky, 날짜: 1월 21, 2018 ·

RequestPolicy Continued will take care the rest

5점중 1점 받음

작성: QuantumUserI, 날짜: 12월 30, 2017 ·

Time to switch to alternatives.
Thanks for all the fish.

Firefox 57 compatible add-ons
https://github.com/nylira/prism-break/issues/1850

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Franz Schneider, 날짜: 11월 26, 2017 ·

I love this add-on and it has been central to my privacy protection! Arrgh! Please update for Firefox 57!

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Firefox user 0e9fa2, 날짜: 11월 16, 2017 ·

please update it for new firefox!

much love

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Torchwood01, 날짜: 8월 16, 2017 ·

Without this addon my life will become pathetic and terrible, PLEASE, in the name of all Gods, make a webext version!

5점중 4점 받음

작성: slacker69, 날짜: 6월 3, 2017 ·

I like this addon mucho, but there is one feature that I would like to request. When changing permissions for a site, every time you click on a change the page has to refresh which is really annoying if you have to accept 10 or 15 different things. It would be nicer if the page refresh happened after you're finished making all the permission changes. (Similar to how NoScript functions)

5점중 5점 받음

작성: mynamekav, 날짜: 10월 25, 2016 ·

Замечательное дополнение, выше всяких похвал. Жаль, что о нём не знал раньше. После установки аж вздохнул с облегчением: настолько легче и шустрее стали грузиться страницы. И то верно, ведь ничего лишнего. Разумеется, requestpolicy следует использовать вместе с NoScript.
Не подойдёт тем пользователям, которые любят на сайтах всякие рюшечки, укаршательства, чтобы всё сверкало-мигало со всех сторон и т.п.

5점중 2점 받음

작성: TruthInAdvertising, 날짜: 10월 5, 2016 ·

RequestPolicy is consuming 4Mb of memory for ... I don't know what.

If I am using another extension such as uBlock Origin, is RequestPolicy even relevant any more?

Thank you for any clarification you can provide users

5점중 4점 받음

작성: gracefool, 날짜: 9월 3, 2016 ·

uBlock replaces Adblock Plus and has an advanced mode that's essentially a better interface for RequestPolicy.

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Logical Youth, 날짜: 3월 22, 2016 ·

thanks for all the fish

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Watilin, 날짜: 10월 13, 2015 ·

This addon provides very fine grained control over which site may or may not interact with another one. It can serve a handful of purposes, including the prevention of tracking.

The downside is that you have to build your own whitelist, and it requires time, and also a reasonable amount of intuition/knowledge to tell apart legitimate 3rd party domains (CDNs, APIs, etc.) from others. Just like NoScript I would say.

Fortunately this addon is most welcome because it fills a gap NoScript and adblockers failed to fill. Let me give an example: I sometimes want to permanently disable my adblocker for a given site; doing so allows legitimate ads but also tracking snippets from social networks such as Facebook Like buttons, which Fanboy's List would block otherwise. With RequestPolicy I'm now able to allow ads on that site while still blocking Facebook buttons. NoScript doesn't have this 3rd party aspect.

Like said in the description, RequestPolicy and NoScript complement each other and allow for a very good privacy and security on the Web.

Definitely worth 5 stars, even despite some minor flaws. I'm sure they'll get fixed soon :)

5점중 4점 받음

작성: alainternaute, 날짜: 8월 23, 2015 ·

Avec cette extension et NoScript, on reprend enfin le contrôle de ce qui rentre et sors de notre ordinateur, on découvre aussi où vont nos informations d'indentification... Une excellente découverte pour ma part.
(Note : DÉBUTANTS S'ABSTENIR)

5점중 4점 받음

작성: My Regs, 날짜: 6월 12, 2015 ·

that can always lead to unk. consequences, hopefully the project is back on track! After using RP for more than a year, I just got used to blocking all the oddball requests embedded in webpages -- the amount of tracking going on is ridiculous! It's like online-stalking. We need to value privacy very highly. The laconic slide into apathy goes down a very [warning: cliche] slippery slope!

Thanks for giving the project new life.

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Skepp Tikal, 날짜: 6월 1, 2015 ·

This advanced user sorely missed the outstanding benefits of RP during the temporary interval when it was unavailable because it was incompatible with FF 38.0. Welcome back RP.

전에 이 사용자는 이 부가 기능에 2개 검토를 했습니다.

5점중 3점 받음

작성: someone, 날짜: 5월 27, 2015 ·

I was a RequestPolicy user but recently switched to Policeman.
* It works better (e.g. it does not collide with newsfox)
* It has a better UI
* Their name sucks :(

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Martin Kimmerle, 날짜: 5월 24, 2015 ·

Dear RequestPolicy users! If you want to use RP 0.5.28 with Firefox 38 or later, you can install the fork of this addon, which you can find there:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/requestpolicy-continued/

It can't be discovered yet through the search, because it's still awaiting review, but you can install it nevertheless.

5점중 2점 받음

작성: skydiver-s, 날짜: 5월 22, 2015 ·

It doesn't work on versions 38.0 and higher. Try to fix that bug.

전에 이 사용자는 이 부가 기능에 1개 검토를 했습니다.

5점중 1점 받음

작성: PlutoSaturns87, 날짜: 5월 21, 2015 ·

Исправте пожалуйста.

5점중 5점 받음

작성: bluonek, 날짜: 5월 18, 2015 ·

Newbies try uBlock
Advanced users try uMatrix

Not only are these CRAZY better than RequestPolicyContinued (in UX and back end functionality), but it improves on what the original RequestPolicy offered. Both are also open source - bonus.

전에 이 사용자는 이 부가 기능에 1개 검토를 했습니다.