Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Achim – A super duper addon. You have provided what no one else has been moved to do. I appreciate your continued Firefox support and thank you.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.6.0). 

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

Achim. This add-on is awesome. ++ Users now have full control over what used to be a cumbersome chore. Thanks for the off-line hint.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.5.0). 

Puntuado con 4 de 5 estrellas

Fortune cookies still not working.
Sig below the line is fine. GO FORTUNE COOKIES,

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.5.0). 

What exactly is your point, posting this over and over again with every new release/version of Signature Switch?
Please either contact me directly via email or get help/assistance somewhere else.
FortuneCookies _DO_ work!

Puntuado con 5 de 5 estrellas

BRAVO!!
by Achim Seufert (Developer) on Dec. 7, 2020 · permalink

There is nothing to "fix" and I'm not at your beck and call.
There are reasons for not putting a signature in between the email-body. You either accept that, or look somewhere else. Thanks.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.4.1). 

Puntuado con 4 de 5 estrellas

I love all the working features of signatureswitch2_4_1, but the random fortune cookie feature is still missing.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.4.1). 

Puntuado con 4 de 5 estrellas

I love all the working features of signatureswitch2_4_0, but the random fortune cookie feature does not work – for me.
I have Thunderbird version 83.0.
Win10 operating system: Version 10.0.18363 Build 18363
If anybody has a clue to make random fortune cookie work for me, I’ll assign a gold star.

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.4.0). 

Puntuado con 4 de 5 estrellas

Nope, this is a review of ver 2.3.1
Has great promise. Everything works except the random sig.
I've tried many permutations to get the random sigs, to populate "[[chuck]]".
This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.3.0).
Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.3.1). 

Puntuado con 4 de 5 estrellas

Has great promise. Everything works except the random sig.
I've tried many permutations to get the random sigs, to populate "[[chuck]]".

Esta valoración es de una versión anterior del complemento (2.3.0).